During the Spanish Civil War, many Catalan writers were forced into exile and, with the exception of Salvador Espriu, ceased to publish new works until after democracy (had been) established.

During the Spanish Civil War, many Catalan writers were forced into exile and, with the exception of Salvador Espriu, ceased to publish new works until after democracy (had been) established.

Answer is No Error. Why? I thought “had been” needed to be changed to “was” because the sequence is:

1) Catalan writers ceased to publish new works
2) Democracy was reestablished.

Since (2) occurred after (1), shouldn’t it be “was” instead of “had been”?

The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them, are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters…

The “common people,” as Plato so charitably calls them, are drawn to “peevish and diverse” characters-such as Odysseus and other heroes in the Odyssey-who (to Plato, anyway) engage in such questionable displays of emotion as “spinning out a long melancholy lamentation” or “disfiguring themselves in grief.”

Which of the following best describes Plato’s view of the heroes mentioned in line 27?

A) Distrust
B) Contempt

Why is Distrust incorrect? I thought “questionable” would indicate distrust.

The whole city is a postcard panorama. Like being inside a grade-school civics text. Today, at least, the monument-flanked boulevards flow with people of all races.

The whole city is a postcard panorama. Like being inside a grade-school civics text. Today, at least, the monument-flanked boulevards flow with people of all races.

Lines 20-21 (“the whole .. text”) suggest which of the following about Delia’s reaction to the city?

C) She sees an idealized version of the city.
E) She is amazed by the sheer size of the city.

Why is the correct answer C?

Why is E wrong? I thought she would feel awe at the “postcard panorama” size city.

A possible first step (in developing) a nonsexist vocabulary with which to analyze the works of the nineteenth-century writer Elizabeth Gaskell would be (to stop) referring to her as “Mrs. Gaskell.”

A correctly written sentence: A possible first step (in developing) a nonsexist vocabulary with which to analyze the works of the nineteenth-century writer Elizabeth Gaskell would be (to stop) referring to her as “Mrs. Gaskell.”

I know the sentence has no errors, but shouldn’t “in developing” be changed to “to develop” in order to be parallel with “to stop”?

In the early songs of the Beatles, one hears melodies that would seem to be more (a product of rural southern America than that of an English industrial city.)

In the early songs of the Beatles, one hears melodies that would seem to be more (a product of rural southern America than that of an English industrial city.)

Correct: a product of rural southern America than of an English industrial city.

Why is the original incorrect? Doesn’t the comparison starts immediately after “more”? So if you have “a product” right after “more” on one side, you must have “a product” on the other. Thus, A PRODUCT of a place is compared to A PRODUCT of another place?

Because she had mistakenly assumed that the disputes between the parties could be successfully ——-…

Because she had mistakenly assumed that the disputes between the parties could be successfully ——-, the attorney had not prepared herself for the ——- of a long, drawn-out public trial.

A) mediated..eventuality

B) eased..probability

E) foreseen..inevitability

I understand why choice A is correct, but why are choice B and E incorrect?